🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.